| Welcome | |
|---|---|
| Welcome to <strong>truecrimeweblog</strong>.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>! |
|
Moderators: skeptical bystander, Michael
Rob wrote:great tech guys ...just in time to disrupt discussion of the defense lodged ojections to pursuing the recommended charges AND the deliberations of the court in proceeding or not...
Soozie wrote:Michael, I just took a look at the link for the phpBB3 features and saw something called: Friends/Foes. Would this work like an ignore button for the 2 extremely boring and repetitive foes who frequently troll this board with their garbage and misinformation?
Division wrote:With the release due in about five hours I want to give everyone an update. The automated upgrade system will not be ready for the initial release, we expect this to be completed late this week. All new forum signups will be switched over to the V3 system and will be fully functioning.
Closer to release I will be making a post outlining the included and future planned features.
Thanks for using FreeForums.org
soozie UK wrote:[font=Times New Roman]Thanks Michael, I belong to another forum (audio-related) so I know about ignored posts being visible if someone else quotes from it. And I doubt very much whether the 2 people I'm thinking of (one in particular), will post anything of any relevance, since they haven't done so from the beginning! Why break the habits of a lifetime?? It doesn't matter anyway, it will be so much easier to filter them out than it is now, and will not doubt save quite a few tempers!! It's positive news, that's the main thing.[/font]
rob wrote:"What is exciting 'me', is the ability to merge posts and topics...and...and...create 'Child Forums'...each with individualy tailored perms if required!!!"
it will be unusable like discus was with bells and whistles hindering conversation.
.
Skep wrote:There hasn't been much going on behind the scenes to speak of, and Michael has been kept in the loop.
May wrote:I also wonder what Michael feels about this too - as the joint moderator?
Michael wrote:Skep, Fast Pete...let me know if I've misunderstood anything.
Fast Pete wrote:1) TJMK is not a board, Michael. It's a blog. There's a difference. This is a board
Fast Pete wrote:2) What Skep and I posted for May on the main thread describes it better than this.
Fast Pete wrote:3) You were enthusiastic, not bitterly against; you in effect said "the more the merrier'.
Fast Pete wrote:4) Photos are now going up, and Skep is about to be in touch with all the posters.
Fast Pete wrote:5) And people are very keen to begin. They want justice to be SEEN to be done here.
fast Pete wrote:The thing is growing organically. That is good. And so will the readership. Let it ride.
Return to The Murder of Meredith Kercher
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests